xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/372/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

18287 Novr. Feb.2

Ch. VII Probation & Evidence
S.18. Character Evidence

Procedure Penal Code. 8
Exclusion of character
evidence
Reason 1 The effect
not the of evidence of
habitual mendacity
not to produce exclusion
of a witness

Ratiocinative

Art 8. Why in ordinary cases, put in this case an exclusion upon
character evidence? Answer. Reason.

1. For the reason as per 11. the effect of any
evidence ass even of habitual of mendacity will not be to produce
the exclusion of the individual in the capacity of a witness
side effect that of producing an opinion in affirma of
a corresponding degree of comparative untrustworthiness
in the part of his personal evidence

9
Reason 2. Such evidence
only amounts to weak
circumstantial evidence

Ratiocinative

Art.9.22. It follows For the species the utmost grand
that can be afforded will can not amount to any thing more than
or a weekly operating article of circumstantial evidence. It
follows not that because a man his attend wilful falshood
in cases where in cases of incidently no punishment would
how he would in any thing like as in equal degree to
so to do in a case in which by such mendacity to
would expose himself to the punishment appointed by the law
for that crown.

10
Reason 3 11 Boundless
delay vexation & expence
the admission might be
made to produce

Ratiocinative

Art. 10.3. Boundless is the delay, expence and
vexation that might which it would be in the power of a
malaside litigant of an evil conscious is to litigant
to necessitate of an unlimited facultyright of calling in evidence
for this purpose were established.

1. Boundless as to number
of witnesses called

1. Boundless the number of witnesses whose evidence
to called-in in the first instance: for the need would be
variable according to the importance of the matter in dispute, and
the difficulty attendant or the question of fact, with or without
other circumstance. Incompatible with any well grounded decision
on the question regarding evidence would be every attempt to
fix the allowable number of character-witnesses by general rule.



Identifier: | JB/052/372/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1828-02-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

372

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

ratiocinative / ratiocinative / ratiocinative

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1827

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

17045

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk