xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/052/383/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. July 20

Procedure Penal Code. Ch. Initiative Application Litescontestational
S.2. Judges agenda consequential

2
Pursuer being constituted
- subseqential
operations & affecting
persons alone 2 affecting
things alone 3 applying
to persons & things

Art. The Seat simply petition or mealfatise examination of the applicant being established
in the character of a litiscontestational applicant is my
Pursuer, and a correspondent memorandum entered in the Register from being
will have to consider the next operation a assemblage of operations
which the nature of the case requires

3
Next operation
iual of 2. Proposed
Defendants attendance
requiring mandate 2.
Proposed defendants
examinative mandate

These operations may be either operation applying affecting persons when
as operations affording things when is operation applying to able person
and thing

Art. Exception excepted the name operation will
be performed by the issuing of aproposed Defendants attendance - requiring
mandate or 2 in case of defendants more than one an Allowance
requiring mandate for each. or|2. a proposed Defendants Examination
mandate or say Examination paper and so where
there are proposed Defendants more than one defendants
Examination paper addressed to each: the proposed Defendant being in
this case the only person addressed in the first place

4
Exceptions where
to judge appears more
advantageous to issue
previously attendance
requiring on Examination
mandates to
other actors on the
Judicial theatre.

3. Art Exceptions are where on consideration upon hearing the of it
state of the case as resulting from the examination of the Applicant
as entered in the Record it appears to the Judge that the purposes
of justice may be more effectually accomplished by the simultaneous
or previous issuing of mandate Attendance requiring
or Examination mandate as the case may appear to require
addressed to a proposal Copursuer or is a proposedsupposed Evidence holder
and proposed Evidence furnishes of evidence personal, real or
within, or of all three sorts or any two thereof, as the case may be



Identifier: | JB/052/383/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1826-07-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

2-4

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

383

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17056

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk