JB/056/005/001

Click Here To Edit

1827. Jany March 10
Procedure Logic

I
Ch. Incongruities
§.

1. Intervals of time. 2. Quantities of money for 1. punishment 2. satisfaction
in the way of indemnification for wrongs; 3. for costs of defence
§. 1. Shapes of the
§. 2. Proof of their incongruity — evil consequences
§.3. Causes

Quere — the relation between
Fixation and Judges Options

Ch.

Seats and causes of incongruity [or say error] in the
[rules of procedure]

Incongruities in Procedure — their seats modes [Shapes]/exemplifications and causes

§.1 Shapes or say exemplifications

Art. 1. Incong Certain
Incongruities observable
in all hitherto established
systems of procedure.

Art. 1. Certain features of incongruity will be
seen which hitherto have been in a greater or less degree common to all hitherto
established systems of procedure: in examination they
will be seen to have originated out of them in an a common course
cause set of causes

☞ Here enumerate them

Art. 2. Incongruity the 1st
Incongruous fixation of
quantities when the exigency
requires diversifiableness.

1. Incongruous fixation of quantities when the exigency requires diversifiableness.
Function of quantities may is deemed incongruous, when
and in so far as one quantity alone being in each individual
case suitable to the purpose which others in indefinite
number are unsuitable, some one quantity is allotted assigned
to have place for whatsoever number of individual cases
as have place may in all future times come to have
place. The consequence or pain th in all cases but on
the fixation is incongruous, and according to the nature of
the occasion productive of immense suffering to a net amount.

Subject matters of incongruously
fixed quantities
1. Time for judicial operations
viz 1. Attendance
at the Justice Chamber 2 Responsion.
2 Compliance with
adduction requiring mandate
2. Money payment
ordered as punishment

Subject matters of quantity thus incongruously fixed
are the following

1. Time, quantities of time or say length of periods for divers
judicial like contestational operations to be performed by actors in the judicial
drama whether as parties or extraneous witnesses or functionaries,
Operations: viz. 1. Respon Attendance at the Justice Chamber
permanent or occasional. 2. Responsion. 3. Compliance with
an adduction requiring mandate, whether for the purpose of
probation or execution:
[+] [+] the fixation being made
without allowance for distance
to place, anymore
than for the individual circumstances
of individual
objects — persons and things
2. Money payment transfer of which is ordered for the subsequently preventive purpose of punishment.

Identifier: | JB/056/005/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.
Date_1	1827-03-10	Marginal Summary Numbering	Not numbered
Box	056	Main Headings	Procedure Code
Folio number	005	Info in main headings field	Procedure
Image	001	Titles	Ch. / Seats and causes of incongruity or say errors in the rules of procedure / Incongruities in Procedure: their /seats and causes / exemplification / modes / shapes/
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	D1 / E1
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	George Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	18061
Box Contents