★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
I
Ch. Judge's Options
§.1 Subject matters of the Options
viz. as to presenting of accounts
and prehension, for attendance
☞.. N.B. Note here, the
relation between Judge's Options
and correspondent and opposite
incongruous fixation
Ch
Judge's Options as to priority of attendance, as to the several
parties, bearing different relations to the suit.
§.1. Subject matters of option enumerated, or see
§ Proceedings immediately subsequent to the location of a Pursuer.
Art. 1. Subject matters for Judge's Options:- Options to be made
by Judges.
Art Subject matters of
Judge's Options
1. Order of attendance
of 1. co pursuers, if any
2. Proposed Defendant or
Defendants 3. Pursuers
witnesses 4. Proposed defendants
witnesses — Option
1. as to the class 2. as to the
individuals in each class.
2. Time of attendance
of such parties with or
without adduction of real
and written evidence
3. Option as to 1. Attendance
for oral examination
2. Examination in
the epistolary mode 3
Reference to a succedaneous
or to an auxiliary Judicatory
4. In the case of an Account sent Option as to the
order of examination as
between demand and demand
1. After appearance of an applicant, and his being received entered
and established in the character of a pursuer, option
as to the order of attendance on the part of parties co-pursuers
if any 2. Proposed Defendant or Defendants, 3. Pursuers
witnesses. 4. proposed Defendants Witnesses viz. 1. Options as to the
assemblage or class as above 2. as to the individuals in each Class
2. In each the Incongruity of the correspondent and opposite fixative.
2. In regard to each such proposed apparent option
as to the da time of appearance attendance, with or without adduction
of real and written evidence.+
3. Option in regard to atten the case of each, as between
1 Attendance for oral examination in the initiating Judicatory
2. Examination in the epistolary mode f by and from the initiating
Judicatory
3. Reference to for oral examination, to another Judicatory, under the name of a succedaneous, auxiliary, Judicatory; succudenaeous if the suit
is dismissed from the initiatory Judicatory; auxiliary,
if it is not dismissed from the initiating Judicatory.
the other Judicatory being employed no otherwise than for
partial probation or definitive execution or eventual execution-serving
4. In the case of an Account suit i.e. a Suit simply
in respect of the distinct services demanded with a different
effectual cause of right or title to demand in the case of each option
as to the order of examination as between demand and demand
+ ☞ Insert elsewhere causes of need of evidence adduction
by parti individuals appropriately circumstanced — need of not only
apt capacity, but explicit ne also certain or eventual need of appropriate explanation
Identifier: | JB/056/010/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-03-10 |
Not numbered |
||
056 |
Procedure Code |
||
010 |
Procedure |
||
001 |
Ch. / Judges' Options as to priority of attendance, as to the several parties, bearing definite relation to the suit |
||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
D1 / E1 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1826 |
|||
18066 |
|||