JB/057/053/001

Click Here To Edit

Evidence

1. Choice of the Court in qua Forum in quo — English law.
If the this is that consideration of utility, the the urgency of it is it appears the
If in consideration In the the if a consideration thought appear obvious, obvious that the mention of it
seems negatory, be sure of finding it neglected in English law.

In the fixation of the Court forum in quo the only consideration here
regarded, is the convenience of the parties: the term is the difference, as the case may be on the same occasion, this
is not the only consideration not attended to in English law

The note under which the law on this head causes falls to be ranged
is that of "changing the venue" Supposing the forum already not fixed
by other considerations — by some general rule, it falls naturally to
be fixed by him the party by whom the suit is commenced — that is
by the plaintiff. But so effectually has the matter been perplexed
with a of giving him that option that will after all the pretended
exertions pretended to be taken with a view to certainty, the question topic is
kept afloat and remains still an co-exible source of fresh contests and
fresh fees. The plaintiff, that as his Attorney, choice makes
choice of that forum which best suits his the plaintiff: convenience but what
in the ordinary state of things the plaintiff never knows, and his Attorney always knows is —
that this fixation will not stand good, any further than the defendant adversary
chooses to acquiesce in it: which in certain cases the Attorney knows before hand
he will not do, the same circumstance which render it convenient
to the plff, rendering it inconvenient to the defendant. Hence an
application from the defendant to change the forum Court, to change
as the language is — the venue: from which application, according
as it is opposable or unopposable, opposed or not opposed
is productive of more or less profit to the lawyers men of law more or less
vexation to the visitors, but at any rate of some, and that whatever it be altogether
unnecessary without necessity or use and tainted therefore pregnant with injustice therefore

( ) from ruin; the place district/County out from out of which from whence the Jury was to
come. were the characteristic words in the order -the from
to the Sheriff of that county.

Identifier: | JB/057/053/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	057	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	053	Info in main headings field	[[info_in_main_headings_field::evidence[deleted]]]
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	18383
Box Contents