xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/057/150/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1824 Nov 30 +
Procedure Code

Ch Obstruction
§ Applicants cointerests

§. Obstruction Multitude of applicants cointerestees

1
Applicants cointerestees
who

Art. 1. By the a cointerest of any person understand
a person having on the occasion in question an interest compound
with his; inso much that the interest of the one can not
be affected but that the interest of the other will be or will be
liable to be affected; affected in the same manner or in some
other.

2
Cointerestees
1 Persons conjointly
entitled to property
2 Persons having
received bodily injury
by the same maleficent
act

Art.2. Of the Cases in which persons more than one
be with in relation to another — examples .

1. Persons entitled each or supposing themselves entitled
each to a share in the a thing immoveable, a thing thing moveable
or an aggregate mass of things immoveable

2. Persons having received injury on body or passing
at the hands of a defendant from one and the same act.

3
In this case defendants
attendance not to be compelled
till concurrence or non
concurrence of cointerestees
ascertained

Art. 3. In this case exception excepted, the defendant
ought not to be compelled to attendance till the persons
cointerestees have attended with made service, or personally attendance or
their concurrence or non concurrence in the suit.

4
Reasons
1 That defendant may
suffer but at the same
time
but once the
vexation of attendance
& interrogation
2 That by dismissal
of application defendant
may be compleately
exonerated from the
demand

Art.4 Reasons It is the of this fail these fails
1. The defendant would suffer the vexation of attendance, without
possessing the advantage of exacting appropriate admissions, and or by appropriate
counter interrogation evidence favourable to him,
from the any one absent as from the one present.
2. A By chance in favour of the applicant as against in defence of the defendant
2. By a chance dismissing the application the defendant would
not be exonerated of the demand: for the applicants co-interestees
not having been heard would notwithstanding this dismissal
retain the right to institute a suit during
the same service on the same ground.




Identifier: | JB/057/150/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1824-11-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

150

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

obstruction / multitude of applicants cointeressees

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18480

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk