xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/057/154/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1825. Jany 20 +
Procedure Code

Ch. First Mutual Attendance Intermediate Proceeding
(1 §
§. V11 Proceeding Defence has personally
in of

in default of
attendance in
1 Person to Person
2 Defendant v Defendant
3 Witness or Witnesses
§. Defence has
VI. in case of
Default.

Ch. or §§. Defendant, after accusation received non-attendant

1
Defendant non attendant
after accusation received
Judges options

Art. The Defendants receipt of the accusative
instrument proved and no epistolary excuse for non attendance
received either by epistle or by an attendant proxy for the non-attendance at the Judicature if the Pursuer as a Pursuer attend
accordingly, the Judge has the options following

2
1. To perform the service
demanded

1.. He grants performs the effective services demanded, and to this
end issues the appropriate decrees operative and imperative and
such order as shall be necessary and sufficient for
production of execution and effect.

3
2. To give provisional
execution only

2 Such execution will be provisional and Defensible
only: but at the same time the Judge may by another
order appoint a day on which no sufficient adequate reason
shall have been given received at the Judicature for revoke
or sequence the possession decree, and all possession derived from
it shall be deemed definitive. Name of the appropriate instrument
Definable —execution — notice or warning

4
Considerenda for
Judge

In determining between the whether to issue or not
to issue the order for provisional execution, the Judge will
weigh in his mind the two opposite designs to wit the
danger to the Defendant by of placing in the hands of the pursuer a benefit
which may eventually be found not to belong to him
and the danger of causing to the parties by the pursuer to lose a benefit which
belong: and in so doing he will have regard to what
appears to him the comparative effective responsibility of the
two parties, as between the two parties: endeavouring always
to maximize the improbability of irreparable damage and
thence injustice.




Identifier: | JB/057/154/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-01-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

154

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

defendant, accersition received non-attendant

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18484

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk