xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/057/196/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 4 B + 3
Procedure Code

Ch.
3 6. Transference of suits
§. Judicatory pursuers transference
or defendants

§§ Transference of suits from judicatory to judicatory.

§. Option between the oral mode at the pursuers judicatory
as above and the same mode at another, to wit the proposed defendants
judicatory proceedings in this case

1
Transference of suits
Judges option as to
judicatory whether
pursuers of Defendants

Art. The option decider of the Judge being supposed to
be in favour of the oral mode of commencing the judicial
intercourse between the pursuer and the proposed defendant
the question will be at the justice chamber of what
judicatory shall the attendance for the purpose be required.

2
Pursuers judicatory application
supposed to be made
at his ordinary judicatory

The Defendants judicatory may will be either the same
with the pursuers' judicatory, the be any it being
assumed that the judicatory in which the application has been
made is thehis ordinary judicatory as per Ch. §. is it may be a
different judicatory.

3
Judge to decide as to
comparative evils 1 of
pursuers migration
to Defendants judicatory
2 of Defendants migration
to pursuers judicatory

In this case the Judge will have to consider
which if the two suits correspondent and opposite to the collateral
ends of justice which will be the greater less — the delay vexation
and expense resulting from the migration of the proposed defendant
to the justice chamber of the pursuers judicatory,
or the migration of the pursuer to the justice chamber of
the Defendant's judicatory.

4
Judge will commonly
decide 1 on pursuers
statement 2 on his own
knowledge

For the striking this balance, unless he has deemed
it worth while to call in extraneous evidence for this single purpose
and has accordingly done so, the Judge can have had
no other evidence than the statement given for this purpose by the pursuer
who as to the proper circumstance of convenience and inconvenience
to himself together with the place of the proposed defendants circumstances so
abode
abode he will commonly
be able to spend
in his way of knowledge,
will commonly
as to its circumstances
of convenience and inconvenience attached to the proposed defendants situation and be able to speak otherwise than in the way of belief




Identifier: | JB/057/196/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-03-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

196

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

transference of suits from judicatory to judicatory

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / c1 / d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18526

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk