xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/057/210/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 20
Procedure Code

6
Ch ix
(6 §. Testimony how procurable
6. Means compulsory
accusative or prehension
&c

In what case issuable
Modes in respect 1. Course. 2. Examination

§ Extraneous Testimony how procurable obtainable

() 1 Oral Mode of procurement
12 Place of Testification
3. Information to be given to him in
4 Exam quarter Nil scit ?
5. Intermediate response required
6. Worth or real adduction
Make this a distinct head

7 Cases of
for epistolary
8. Cases for option

Note (a)

(a) In respect of Art means, and thence needs of obtainment
the needs will be either be compulsory, by means of eventual punishment
or remunnatory — by means of eventual reward.

Compulsory mean will be employable f apt t in all cases; remunnatory
in particular cases. First then as to compulsory

15
Means of compulsion
employable on Defendants
for preliminary security
are so likewise for procurement
of testimony

Art. 1. In case of and, whatsoever means of compulsion
are employable, as per §§. on Defendants for the purpose
of preliminary security for eventual execution, are employable
for procurement of testimony, at the hands of extraneous
witnesses

16
Reason evidence holders
adverse interest may be
as strong or stronger
than defendants

Reasons 1. By In By a the way of sinister interest, self-regarding
or sympathetic, a person whose testimony is needed
may be linked with the party adverse to him who has the
need: and may have for the in withholding the testimony may have an
interest as strong as, or even stronger than the party who has in whom is
the need of it

17
In criminal cases
this obviously the case

Such is There is the case obviously and unfully the case the cases
criminal cases whether purely public or public-private.
Co-delinquents Generally speaking Co-offenders will have been precipient witnesses</del>
with relation to each of them of the part borne by the others have
been precipient witnesses, and in that capacity character capable of becoming
with truth judicially narrating witnesses, in particular, accomplices
with relation to as to the species of delinquency the principal.

18
Supposed precipient
witness may have been
. a codelinquent

On examination, this is that person who, in the first instance
was looked to in no other character than that of a precipient
witness may appear to have been a Codelinquent: and being would will of course
have the same reluctance to the coming into the picture and
putting
putting himself within the
power of the Judge, as a
delinquent who has already
been placed in the situation of
proposed defendant




Identifier: | JB/057/210/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1825-03-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-18

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

210

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

note (a)

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18540

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk