xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/057/260/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826 May 12
Procedure Code

1 Preface or Introduction
Beginning

1

☞ State all the judicial offices
&c in the strongest term saying
nothing of the individual the rest of
individuals have not been charged with them &c

If the same or even less benefit
from bad procedure even given
to Judges &c under the name
of reward, everybody would cry
out.

How from want of interest
and knowledge the authority
given to Judges for legislation
failed of its effect.

1 How all the abuse grew out of the mode of payment
2 How a substitute to legislation grew out of judicature
3. Device employed for concealing the usurpation of the legislative authority
4. Concealment by hypocrisy

Preface or Introduction

§. 1. This the first system of procedure of which justice was the ob first object

Without much danger of errors the present
may be stated as being the very first system of judicial
procedure that ever had for its object or say
end-in-view the giving execution and effect given to the
system of substantive law or more shortly the end
of justice. T In regard to the substantive system In every country the system it
had of course for its end in view the particular end interest of
the men rulers in power whoever they were by whose power
alone execution and effect could in any degree be
given to it. In these one persons the whoever they
were they could not suffice for applying to individual
cases and individual persons and things such regulation
and institution as they took upon them to establish, ordain
it was therefore matter of necessity for them to delegate
that function to others in a word in a word to Judges to others who in virtue
of this delegation became Judges. But as the particular
interests of legislators gave rise to the system of legislation, so did the
particular interests of Judges give rise to j the system of
judicature. But when two different particular interests
and corresponding aptitudes even those both together brought into notice, both could not
receive compleat satisfaction; of the several objects of
general desire such the whole aggregate was coveted by
each and the whole could not be had by each: a an sort
an adjustment a partition in some proportion or other
was necessary. A partition was not only necessary to and
possible: a compromise was not possible. A compromise
supposes a mutual explanation: on the part of each party
a declaration and avowal of his pretension

But

Sinister interest expence
a necessary preliminary
viz. to take off the opposing
weight of authority:
for till this opposition is
removed there comes the
argument from the matchless
constitution intellectual
aptitude and the
aptitude of the
opposite

(In this , therefore
as language is to be

Rulers A&c
they may be called,

but without being legislators

By professional men
of high reputation
given the name the Clearing Judges
has been stand charged
with offences for which
but for the protective devices
from and
they might have been
any person at large
who might be men
of the law be
in
punishment to whipping
or transportation

Object —
manuscript



Identifier: | JB/057/260/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 57.

Date_1

1826-05-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

057

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

260

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

preface or introduction

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18590

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk