xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/107/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

14 May 1805
Evidence

Not Without having been productive of mischief in any of
those shapes, it may still happen to the conduct of the a Judge
to be chargeable with precipitation and justly chargeable. The
plaintiff (suppose) is altogether compleatly in the right: demanding at the
charge of the defendant, in quality as in quantity, no other punishment,
no other right, no other satisfaction, than what, by the tenor and spirit of the substantive law, is due.
By the supposition therefore no evil is produced opposite to the
direct end of justice, in any one of its three branches.

But though by the supposition, at the charge of either of
the parties to the cause no mischief has been done, it follows
not but that on the part of the precipitate Judge, there may be
just and very serious cause of censure. – Why? because by the supposition
his conduct is such, as affords serious cause of apprehension
of mischief – an indefinite train mass of mischief, on the
occasion of succeeding suits. Mischief of the first order, none:
but of mischief of the 2d order, danger and alarm, the precipitation
may have produced a very momentous mass.

On the part of the Suppose a penal case. The case is a penal one. A witness has been excluded altogether:
another witness has been cut short in this evidence.
The On which side as the evidence thus precipitately dealt with?
On the side of the Defendant? to the Defendant, no injury
ensues, since for by the supposition he was guilty and
had incurred in a word the exact punishment to which he is
consigned subjected by the ultimate sentence. But, by the same turn of mind rashness
by which a guilty defendant has in this individual instance
been subjected to due punishment, in the next instance that
presents itself some innocent defendant may be subjected to the exactly
the same punishment, though in his instance it be undue.


Identifier: | JB/058/107/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-05-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

107

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18776

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk