xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/205/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

9 June 1805

Delay Causes
I. Unavoidable or Natural
1. Modes of Complication,
as per Table.


---page break---

Delay Causes
II. Factitious and Avoidable
I. Departures from the natural mode
by enquiry, viz
1. Special pleading
Operations proofs from allegations
2. Equity procedure by
Bill and Answer fixt
and being interests between
questions and answers.
3. Information procedure
where inter
4. Attachment procedure –
when inter
5. Where a fact is established
in one suit for
different purposes, requiring
different suits for establishing
it for the different
purposes. – Examples
1. Perjury.
2. Vexatious litigation N.B. The separate suit
should be and instituted
not of course, but only an
allegation and decision
that the purpose of the
decision in the second suit
the evidence and
in both one of other
side was not sufficient
in the first.


---page break---

Undue decision – of
Causes Factitious

I. Decision adverse to the Plff for
1. Non correspondence of the
evidence with the species
of action indicated by the
declaration.
☞ Refer this to the head
of Nullities

Intricacy Delay an
Wrongful Decision
Vexation & Expence

Pain of Nullity - Occasions
1. Transgression of regulations
of procedure real or
imaginary.
2. Abatement – i.e. by for
Transfer or creation of
interest by, 1. Death.
2. Marriage. 3. Birth.
3. Non-correspondence
of Evidence with the
original allegations
viz. 1. Declaration ex
pate Plff. 2. Plea ex
parte Defendant.
☞ The above entered under
Delay or Evil Causes.


---page break---

Note 8(a)

In the rude ages In those rude ages in which the germ of the existing systems
of procedure first began to develop itself how should any
such suspicion have presented itself to men's minds?

From At the close of the 18th Century it had never presented
itself to the penetrating mind of Adam Smith. He saw no harm
in fees: neither in the character of a principle of corruption,
nor yet in the character of an ill-seated a mis-seated tax. To him it never
occurred that the persons who derive the least benefit from the protection
afforded by the Courts of Justice, are those who are forced into them
in the capacity of suitors. The protection which others a suitor pays for, perhaps
by all he is worth, non-suitors enjoy gratis. See Protest against
Law Taxes.


Identifier: | JB/058/205/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-06-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

8a

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

205

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

delay causes / intricacy / delay in wrongful decision / vexation & expence

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3*

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18874

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk