JB/062/185/002

Click Here To Edit

Indirect

persondraft-making -tory? this the traveller has not told us. How
it should have gained footing as a matter of
choice it is difficult to conceive for what motive
could have given birth to it? what benefit a man may have from
it (and we shall see hereafter that that benefit
is not small) results not from the deference
he himself pays to it, but from the deference
paid to it by other people. As the Is it compulsory? The extraordinary severity of the laws of the rigid evidence paid to them seems to render this improbable,as the deference paid to this custom seems not to be clear distribute of
This it could then This one should hardly think
it were, considering the severity of the laws
and the rigid uniform obedience that is paid
them; since it seems not to be not mentioned as obtaining admitting
of no exception universally without exception: perhaps the exception
if any may have been made in favour
of particular classes of persons, by the
law itself.

Identifier: | JB/062/185/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 62.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	062	Main Headings	indirect legislation
Folio number	185	Info in main headings field	indirect
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f9 / f10
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	20175
Box Contents