JB/063/138/002

Click Here To Edit

A EXEMPTION ACCIDENT

To be considered at p.11.

11*

I have enter'd into this long Historical deduction, & I doubt tedious disquisition for the
sake of giving the reader an general Idea of the manner in which
opinions have been patch'd up: to pursue the same
minute course under every head would be to swell the
work beyond all moderate reasonable/sufferable proportion.

led astray from the principle of utility by the pursuit
of technical analogies

then to put let you into the confidence of my pursuits
but what you profess either a nausea or
a contempt for that whole division of intelligence of
which these pursuits regard a branch which I have not
expressly
indicated to you

I must abandon or at least postpone the
thought of that satisfaction

appetite for absurdity seasoned with inhumanity.

after he had filled selected a certain quantity of paper might with scientific obscurities/
be secure of command [commanding] the idolatry of an uncritical &
barbarousian age.

13.H.7.p.14

Hussey dit q un question dd' de luc que fait Wel.
Clerk dun Egl estant en un chambre fevrit un autre avec les
clefs de l'Eglise, q avec le force del avant dit passer
de la main, & un puistre, & avec ces ousta le ocet dun
Su c dera dit Maihem ou nemy, ces fait question.
Et il semble q so, je ces q il avoit un mauvais intent al commencent
mis doit bon consideration p exper de les damages [scri considerate en les damages.

---page break---

there is another head of cases which however distinct in its nature, one
may suppose to have had some share in influence-ing on their opinions [in establishing that
& which therefore might should have mentioned or and or that held their opinions had just been industrious in
keep upon things really distinct in their nature as much as possible But their yet remarks a case of a very different nature, that seems
intentionally an afflictive energy to one object, misses him & lights it on some other same course may seem referable to this topic — that where a man directing

And there again we shall find no difficulty in determining on our
principles — very different from the former case, the mischief
here is the same as where the intention is directed upon the
same object upon which the exercise of the energy eventually falls — the mischief
in all these is evidently the same to the object — & here it
is the same, with the case what it is in lastmentioned, to the public. Here is
an intention to committ a crime which when committed spreads strikes
a terror in among the society; and that crime is accordingly committed.
It matters not to the Public whether the sufferer be A or B.
Mischief is intended & the same or equal mischief crimes in consequence
of that intention — they learn that mischief is has been committed
& that there exists one who is likely to committ it again

EGRESSO PERSONÆ

☞
egreditor personam

operation

Whether in or out of Court if in whether direct or collateral
whether with the concurrence of the majority or without this, it no
one can tell

v. the other side.

Identifier: | JB/063/138/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	063	Main Headings	law in general
Folio number	138	Info in main headings field	exemptions accident
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	/ c11* / /
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	20327
Box Contents