JB/091/010/001

Click Here To Edit

18 March 1807

And now, my Lord, after this distinction which
to my conception, in which fortunately I hope I am
not singular is both clear and useful, comes the other
which to the same humble conception, being is so far from
being clear, as to be but little calculated ill qualified to be useful. of use.
Of this distinction one term is that sort of Appeal which
is at once frivolous and vexatious/ Looking for a the
correlation for it, I find myself immediately at a loss.
Is it the sort of Appeal that is neither frivolous nor
vexatious? So far so good: but there remains a deal
behind. Beca The two words are they exact synonyms exactly synonymous?
What a pity that one of them had not been left out!
One of them, either of them might in that case have been
rejected as surplusage. Are they not synonymous? Here
we have two sorts of Appeals besides: the Appeal which
is frivolous without being vexatious, and the Appeal
which is vexatious without being frivolous.

Identifier: | JB/091/010/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.
Date_1	1807-03-18	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	091	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	010	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals		Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public		ID Number	29006
Box Contents