JB/091/119/001

Click Here To Edit

23 Decr 1806
Scotch Reform To Ld Grenville

Give judgment for the Plff? – That would be to determine
that the evidence testimony of which it knows nothing, would
had it been given, have been conclusive. Shall it simply suspend
the final judgment, remitting it to the Court below, one
of the Chambers of Sessions, to have cause the testimony to
be collected? This would be – not precisely entertaining an
Appeal against an interlocutory judgment alone, but something
worse. The delay occ that would have been occasioned
by the Appeal against the interlocutor alone would it have
been too great to be endurable? Here is that same delay produced,
plus with the addition of the delay intervening between the interlocuted
and the final judgement. Say that the interval delay between interlocutor
and final judgment would be the same whether the final judgment
were pronounced before Appeal, so if or afterwards: if nothing be lost by
the prohibition put
upon the appeal against the
Interlocutor alone nothing
in point of dispatch would be lost, still nothing
would be gained.

What if it be a case for examination in perpetuanris
memoriam, or for examination. Sestui Latino-Anglicé
de bona esse? At the time of tenders calling for the evidence The witness in at the point of death or expatriation: and long before the House has given its Judgement.
(By the preceding Resolution there is the new Chamber
of Review for the cause to go through first) the testimony is
gone! nor let it Not but that it should be altogether forgotten, that
we are dying at all ages.

It is by an Interlocutor that provisional possession is delivered:
but the effect of provis such delivery if made to a
wrong person may be irreparable injury. Irreparable injury
by waste: the land stripped of its timber timber cut down and sold: the house
pulled down and the materials sold. Irreparable injury to person
yet more serious. Woman delivered to a wrong husband: female
orphan to a instead of a proper guardian. When
Virginia was put into the hands of the nominee of Appius,
it was or might have been by an Interlocutor.

Identifier: | JB/091/119/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.
Date_1	1806-12-25	Marginal Summary Numbering	5-6
Box	091	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	119	Info in main headings field	scotch reform to ld grenville
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public		ID Number	29115
Box Contents