JB/091/120/001

Click Here To Edit

26 Decr 1806
Scotch Reform To Ld Grenville

Those are particular cases: and the over-amplitude of supposing
the Resolution to be in those respects too extensive, its the over-amplitude
might be corrected by apposite exceptions.

But The proposed prohibition of Appeals against Interlocutory
Judgements assumes and supposes a clear and
invariable line of distinction in existence drawn between interlocutory
judgements and final ones. Exists there Does any such line exist my Lord?
I do not mean in form, but in effect? Is it altogether
clear that neither precedent nor analogy can afford
either warrant or plausible pretence for framing pronouncing judgments that
shall be interlocutory in form, final in effect? Take
almost any final judgement at random, is there can there be any difficulty,
in framing a judgement, which shall be being in all other aspects
the same, with the single difference of its being
declared to be provisional only, reserving to another time the definition Disposal
of the matter subject matter or dispute till another time? This
interlocutory judgement, (for under that appellation surely it
would come) this interlocutory judgement, for so long as it
continues unmodified unaltered, produces the effect of a final one.
But who is there to alter it? But by whom is it to be altered? The Court below will
not: and the Court above, the House of Lords, this Resolution
being carried into act, can not.

Identifier: | JB/091/120/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.
Date_1	1806-12-25	Marginal Summary Numbering	7
Box	091	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	120	Info in main headings field	scotch reform to ld grenville
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public	"adoptanda?"	ID Number	29116
Box Contents