xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/091/235/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

Feby 1808

Between the mode of appeal pursued in the House of
Lords, the mode pursued in the ambulatory travelling Court of Justitiary,
and the mode pursued in the case of appeal
from Justices of the Peace out acting out of Sessions
to Magistrates of the same order sitting collected together in
those many seated judicatories there may be this or that
feature circumstance of difference might be discoverable, and in the least imperfect best ordered
of the three room for amendment might perhaps be found.
But so inconsiderable in comparison are those three modes
from one another, and so wide is the difference between
each of them and the mode pursued under the names
of suspension and advocation in the Edinburgh Bill
Chamber that in comparison of the worst ordered mode
that ever bore the name of appeal everything known presented
by the name of Advocation or Suspension may be without
prejudice to justice be posted up as an unexampled nuisance.

(I mean in the
case where the scene suit
of the operation is
a superordinate not
an immediate judicatory.)
☞ or put this in a Note


Identifier: | JB/091/235/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.

Date_1

1808-02-15

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

091

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

235

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / c3 / d29 / e26

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

29231

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk