JB/091/309/001

Click Here To Edit

1 March 1808

But the in in being set at £20 it may hap have happened that the pr detriment
to B was over-valued, or that it was undervalued:
and so in the case of the detri estimate by which the detriment
to A was set a £20.

But of the innumerable cases of exemption in
which an exemption from this obligation is granted
by the technical system, there are few, if any, and
those few only by accident or, that are in which
the exemption is placed in any such rational grounds.

Where Of two cases A and B, in case A in which the quantity of evil in the shape of delay
vexation and expence is less they attendant on the
exhibition of the evid article of evidence in question is
half they will the imposition of the obligation will be
refused: in case B in which the quantity of that mass
of evil is greater (the amount of the of misdecision being the same
in both cases, the obligation will be imposed.

Where the obligation is imposed the imposition
of it can not scarce ever be defended but on principles some principle which
passes condemnation in the refusal to impose it
where it is refused to be imposed: where the imposition
of the obligation is refused, the refusal can not scarce ever be
defended but on principles which pass condemnation
in the imposition where it is imposed.

Identifier: | JB/091/309/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 91.
Date_1	1808-03-01	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	091	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	309	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals		Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	29305
Box Contents