JB/095/025/001

Click Here To Edit

TURNP. A. UNSTeadiness of expression proved bad.

Lex univocalitatis

The proof of this is as follows is is demonstrated from the following considerations
The two causes are supposed to be of the same
effect directed to the same end, & seeking itaiming at
substantially by the same means.

Either then the importsignification of the Set of cases,
and in each is precisely the same or it is
different

The pecuniary penalty is very properly inserted to take in I suppose this case of those who hold not at the pleasure of the Trustees

If it be precisely the same, then can no reason
be urged why one oughtshould not serve for both - if
the interests of uniformity are a reason why it should.
If there is a difference, then either each is equally
adaptedproper to the effect required, or one is more
so than the other.

If the former be.each be equally proper this , then is there no
reason against others being used for the others &
there is the reason for it that has been encountered
above
If one is more so than the other, then is there
double reason for why that should be adapted
solely

1st that of it's being more proper as by the supposition

2nd that of uniformity, as before

Identifier: | JB/095/025/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	095	Main Headings
Folio number	025	Info in main headings field	turnp. a. unsteadiness of expression proved bad
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	30911
Box Contents