JB/119/076/002

Click Here To Edit

long one to a round one? Is the long one as good
as the round one? then there is no inconvenience harm done
and the object met supposed inconvenience aolledged supposition is
by the objection is given up. Is the long as one
so much inferior to the round one? in proportion is the
excellence of the round one circular plan. The bon added
long one will not have cannot be made the peculiar advantages
of the round one. No True: not if it be so
small as not to admitt of a spot for an Inspector in the middle. But does this disprove the advantages
of the circular construction? does it
not confess and build upon them? With a
powerful building upon this one plan and a
small appendage upon some one of the old common ones
you will not have a while building so perfect as if
the whole wa were upon the new plan – True:
but will not the building thus compounded of
a great part excellent & a small part excellent and ordinary be as good as one which
is ordinary throughout? – For there lies the option – that is the true
question. Does the a comparative inferiority
of the one destroy the excellence utility either absolute
or comparative of the other? Would it be a
reason for preferring a shilling to a guinea because
if you wanted more money you could not
get

Identifier: | JB/119/076/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	119	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	076	Info in main headings field
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d1 / d2 / d3 / d4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur young
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	39587
Box Contents