JB/119/078/004

Click Here To Edit

they don't mean to do any thing they are liable to
be punished for they don't care who looks at
them: and if perchance they should have any such
forbidden project, can the eye of an inspector be
deemed to unreasonable? The argument in
that case only amounts to this: that it is a hardship
to be debarred from doing any thing one wishes to do:
therefore criminals should be suffered to do as they
please. Or is it that punishment is better than
prevention: and that instead of having neither the
one nor the other the best way is to have sometimes
the mischief of delinquency, sometimes
that of the ineffectual punishment that is has been opposed
to it that has been been and is to be ineffectually
opposed to it?

With whatever But suppose the sentiment
peculiarly irksome acute at first which as I have
already so observed is more than it appears
to me, would it not under the hardening influence
of habit have soon lost its point? been soon blunted? Now Under
the ordinary description regimen of a school what is it that
makes the youth so sensible to the ever moving exercise repressive
influence of the masters eye? Is it not the alternation
the perpetual alternation between liberty
& subjection? is not the vividness of the idea impression
the sole effect of contrast?

Identifier: | JB/119/078/004 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	119	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	078	Info in main headings field
Image	004	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d1 / / / d4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur young
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	39589
Box Contents