JB/119/079/002

Click Here To Edit

§ Objections

It is fit for applicable to a prison: therefore not for
School. Why not the less fit applicable to a School?
What is there that should render it otherwise.
The form of the building? Prejudice only alone, hostility
deduced from a superficial and slight analogy
can as is hath just been shown, harbour
a thought suspicion of its being less favourable to cheerfulness
than any other. Is it the nature
of the discipline? What is there in that? Is it
obliged to be severer more harsh than that carried on in
an ordinary school, or at all more likely to be
so because it is capable of being so? Are not
the checks upon undue severity on the one part as powerful as those
upon disorder on the other? Are not the masters
the Inspectors as much exposed to inspection
as the inspected? Will there, can there be any measure or
species or degree of severity practised there which
the fondest parent would not approve? Can
it be the interest of any master to practise
it?

Identifier: | JB/119/079/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	119	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	079	Info in main headings field	objections
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	39590
Box Contents