xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/119/188/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

Panopticon Bill Reasons

II. Objections to a valuation new in tote; in contradistinction
to the assessment of supplemental price.
— or

II. Reasons for proposing the assessment of a
supplemental price, in preference to a valuation new in toto.

1. The value found must
be taken for a true one
for the time.

What every body knows is that for the purpose
fo the formerly intended Penitentiary establishment the value
of the land has been already found. The Verdict by which it
was found must, till some objection be made to it, be taken
for a true one. I mean always a true one for the time.

2. But may be insufficient
at this time - on either of
two suppositions.

If then, on the part of the proprietors, a fresh
verdict be demanded, it can only be on the ground of one or
other of two suppositions.

1. Fall in the value of
money whence the proposal
of a supplemental
price.

1. That through a true verdict for that time,
it would not be a true verdict for this: for that the £660, if
paid & laid out now; would not go so far as it would have done
had it been paid & laid out then. This I admitt: & what I
propose accordingly is, that the enquiry of the Jury should
take for its object the difference between the time's price of that
time, & that of the present: but that it should go no farther.

3.
2. Intervening improvement.

2. The other supposition is, that since the
giving that verdict, money has been laid out upon the land:
which being the case, the land is no longer the same estate. The
consequence I admitt, if the supposition were true: but I do
not believe that it is, or that any allegation to that effect would
be made.

4. Answers

If it were made, there are two answers to it.
One is that it was the folly (to use the law-expression) of the
Proprietors to lay out money upon land of which they knew
themselves



Identifier: | JB/119/188/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 119.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-9

Box

119

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

188

Info in main headings field

panopticon bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 /

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

39699

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk