★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1) Panopt Narrative 18 Mar 1802
Charges against White Long Rise of Pitt
1
1. Refusal to prepare
Contract 11 May 1799
J.B. to Long §§.5.C.12
3 2. Refusal to deliver
Deeds 15th Novr 1799
2
3. 2 Joining in clandestine
steps for obtaining
the Money without the
privity of J.B. that
the money might be
put into Ld S.'s pocket
without the lands being
clear of leases. [+]
[+] and without J.
B.'s knowing that
the £1000 for the
clearing away the Leases
was not comprised
in it, whereby
J.B. was prevented
all that while from
solliciting the Warrant
for the money
for himself for that
purpose according
to the plan offered
to and approved by
Long.
3
3. Obtaining
J.B.;s signature
in consequence to the
receipt — though nothing
was received. 15 Nov
1799. Conn. Obs.
4
4. Refusal to deliver
deeds to the Feoffee/Feeoffice?
15 Novr 1799 Conn.Obs.
5
5
5. + + Long suppressed
on that occasion
my armed letters
sending only the
unarmed one to
White Wilful neglect in
not making any Report
from (4 Decr
day of Long's letter) to
28 Jan 1800 day of
J.B.'s application to
him (§§.6.D.7) on
pretence of J.B.'s
never having applied
to him — tho by Long's
Letter 20 Feb. 1800)
it appears that that very
day he made his Report.
6. Wilful refusal
to turn to the Act on
that occasion — or hear
J.B.
7.
7. Taking upon himself
to oppose for
a frivolous reason,
the recommendation
of the competent
authority (the Surveyor
General) he
being not not
competent to judge
but having no knowledge
of the matters
of fact on which the
eligibility of the venture
depended. See how
the Act is quoted in
Long's
7
Long's letter to J.B.
20 Feb. 1800. D.8.
He having no reason
to think the leases
would be bought out
for less than the £1000
but
7.
but having good
reason to think the
contrary, from the
Surveyor General's
Report
8
8. Refusing to fix
any day for the lessees
to quit, but
requiring the Surrenders
of the terms
to be immediate
in consequence of
which the clause
not an edict
amounted to £12000
D.12 Wh. to J.B.
22 Feb. 1800.
9
9. Loades/Evades? sending Counterparts of Leases
as desired by J.B.
although thry were
necessary to J.B.
for the dor entering
upon the treaty
he had been sent
upon according
to White's Report
D.12 as above
10
10. Rights obtaining
the Counterparts
of the Leases previous
to the completion
of the Conveyance —
although
he must have known of their
existence from Estcourt
&c.
1
1 That having entered
into the conspiracy
for defeating the establishment,
and having
entered into the
plan or conspiracy
for wasting the public
money in the
purchase of Ld Salisbury's
estate for the
benefit of Ld Salisbury
in pretence of
its being for the establishment,
he proposed
the Estate to J.B.
in the intent pretence
of intending to apply it to that
purpose, but intending
in fact
never so to do: he
undertook the management
of the business for the express
purpose of causing
it to miscarry.
2
2. Having promised
compliance with J.
B.'s application for
the Previous Contract
and having through
carelessness and for
want of seeing the
to the prejudice
of the object of
the conspiracy, obstructed
a resolution
of the Board
to that effect — and
announced it to J.
B. and written a letter
in conspiracy to White.
3. He either gave
or was privy to
secret orders application
without
and contrary to the
authority of the Board
for rendering the
direction of the Board
to White without
effect.
|
Identifier: | JB/120/071/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 120.
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-03-18 |
1-10, 1-13 |
||
|
120 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
071 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::panopt. narrative charges against white long rise of […?] brouillon]] |
||
|
002 |
white / long |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
cw 1799 |
||
|
c. abbit lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
39897 |
|||