★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Marginal
Connects Observs(Incapacity
(Killing no murder
Killing no Murder
7.
2. Pitt's speech when
he was told of the
loss of the season
through the (probably
wilful) neglect of
his own instruments.
He imputed it to
J.B. & exulted in it.
8
In the whole seven
years never the
least expression of
sympathy from Long
- i.e. to JB. for J.Bs
sufferings - only at
first for Pitts violated
honour. -
Proof of mala
fides
8. The dukes a fraud
or of these
letters - so that after
this he writes no
more
Consequence
He may do what he
pleases in the
condition - and
to some men use a
very burthernsome one
of
*truth -
Better to have it
them with it.
Conclusion
Justification
Had the been
that of Statesmen they
might have passed thereafter
in . But their
<add> having been
that of malefactors,
their place is among
malefactors.
&c
Conclusion.
5 Public record
1. To give to the Establishment
at least the
promised
2. to
J.B. for past oppressions
and humiliations
3. and the Authors
of the oppression -& breach
of public fuilli.
[+] When they all matter of fact by way of excuse, the question is whether every bilewick in it ?
4. Ld Pelham applied to
as a Mediator.
Inadvertence
All pretences of it are
out of the question for
the Duke A man to say says
he has read the
he understands the effect
of it,
Baldw Civil List
Times 23 March
1802
"W Baldwin Esq" as a
reward for his advice in
Counsel to the Secretary of State
in 1800 £1.624
1801 655 7' 6d
1802 547 12'
[the Letter only
the greatest number: but
the increase: but the
design in the
The dispensing power
the
The Treasury friend acts
the Duke principili
Pulman's case harsh:
illegal.
The Duke &c had as
sure of a plan for subverting
the Construction,
least.
Judge decides
there be
the money
Parliament in case of
danger and think he
was of the danger.
The Duke conceives that
he may annul rescind an
imperative act of Parl'
if it be an improper:
and that he a judge
of the impropriety.
He also concurs that
it belongs to him to size
up the minds of the
if it be probable
that they would
infrequently
and he concurs
that it is probable.
It is not worth
over these that
man set to make
execute or annull repeal <add> abrogate</add>
laws.
Conclusion Addington
G. Nothing said of the
present Administration
1. because of the power it
gives me to of it
2. Because it will be the
subject of a picker
Dispensing Power
3 1
The illegality of the
Dukes & King's exercise
of the dispensing
power could not
but have been
fully known to them -
they had full notice
of it. - p.1.
4 2
It was not a mere
so not a
honest misconstruction
of the Act. p.1.
5 3.
The Act has no
words in it on which
any misconstruction
could be put. p.2.
4
6 4
The Duke says he has
read the Acts - but
if this were admitted
as a proof of misconstruction -
any man
in his place might
overrule an Act of
Parliament on condition
of pretending to read
in it what is not
there p.2.3.
12 5
Weakness of intellect
no excuse -
He meant no
harm - that is when
he committed the
crime he did not
think there was
any danger of his
being punished for
it. - p.4
13 6
<p>All he chose to think
of was that he was
serving his friends
but he could not
but know that it
was by manipling
on the law. - p.4.
5.
1
2. Imprisonment
not according to
+
3. 40 days, only
this by ruling by fraud.
4 law to create the
---page break---
Dispensing Power
7
The Duke learnt from
Baldwin that the
only person who
could have to complain
of it was one
from whom he had
no danger to apprehend.
Baldwin's account
of JB. p.5, 6,7.
15 8.
The genuineness of
it is established by
intrinsic evidence.
p.7
16 9. 18
1. Being a matter
of law the Duke
thought King alone
would be responsible
for it - as he took
no money for it -
& it was only to
oblige hid friend -
p.8.
10
2. Their best chance
for escape is the
ridicule attached to
the idea of a great
crime committed
by one personally
so little. - p.9.
18 11.
This plea ought not
to be admitted even
in extenuation -
Not only in itself
the offence was mischievous -
but as a
precedent if unpunished
it would be dangerous.
p.10, 11
7 12.
That the crime was
unnecessary since the
object of the conspiracy
could have been equally
attained without
it - neither
justification nor
extenuation. p.11
Dispensing Power
23 8 13.
4. The crime might equally
have been committed without
the letter that furnished
the proof of it.
- but this proves
folly only but no innocence.
p.12
23 9 14.
The act might mave
passed as an honest error
if the criminal principle
had not been avowed
by the foolish letter. p.13
25 10 15
This no more than an
excuse than it would
be to a thief to say I
should not have been
found out if I had
not betrayed myself.
p.14
21 2 16
The act contains all the
ingredients of criminality.
1. Act requires Panopticon
to be built.
2. Panopticon unbuilt.
3. The Duke &c stopping it.
4. Sending
that should be put there.
5. Calling it in. mocking
a law of Parliament.
7. Knowing that there
is nothing in the law
of Parliament to
warrant it. p.1516
1 2 17: <add>
(This is legislative power -
(a much greater power
(than dispensing -
(the crime of usurping
(it so much the worse p.16
11 18 v.g.
Taking money for it
would only have made
the proof more simple
but not the crime or
unfitness greater -
there are more species
of corruption besides
that. - p.16, 17
19
The Duke &c thought
themselves safe because
opposition
was quiet but the
time was not ripe for
the thieftakers. p.18
|
Identifier: | JB/121/013/003 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-5, 1-6, 1-19 |
|||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
013 |
Marginal Contents Incapacity Killing no murder Connectg Observs |
||
|
003 |
Incapacity / Killing no murder / Dispensing Power |
||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.
|
A10 / F10 |
||
|
CW 1799 |
|||
|
C. Abbit Lees |
|||
|
1799 |
|||
|
003 |
|||