★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Bentham versus Lds Commissrs of the Treasury Compensation Claim
under 52.G.3.c.44
Third branch of the Claim. Claim for "Loss and Damages by Non-fulfilment
"of the Contract" — Mem. Proof of this branch is supposed to supersede the need
of proof Br of either of the two others.
Proposed Order of Propositions proposed to be
Propositions in proof of which it is proposed to look for Witnesses.
Propositions to be proved
1 1
1. That even Without the help
of the Panopticon Construction,
or Sir. S.
Bentham's inventions
Convict labour is
capable of being rendered
profitable —
and to what a large extent [+]
[+] has been, though
without the encouragement
which under
the Panopticon Contract
would have been afforded,
viz. 1/4 to each man
1/4 of his earnings.
2. 2
2. That even Without the help of
the Panopticon construction
Convicts are
capable of being rendered
in a prison
perfectly orderly and
p tractable.
3 3
3. That by the Panopticon
construction
the security for ness orderliness
and tractability
as also for exactness
of workmanship
and quantity of
work can could not but
be much superior
in the case of an ordinary the prisoners
workman in question to that which has
place in the case
of ordinary workmen,
working on
ordinary terms: in
as much as these prisoners
would have been
at all times all of them
actually in the sight of
the persons having the
direction of their labors
Propositions to be
proved
4
4. That, for a number
of Convict prisoners
amounting to
1000 in every year
work could, by
means of Sir S.
Bentham's inventions,
they being the place of employment
being a
Panopticon as above,
have been executed
to a value sufficient
to render their
earnings per head,
upon an average
equal to 2s.6d per
day, or some other
(and what?) considerable
sum.
5. That for the produce
of all this work
custom could would by
means of the said
inventions have been
found: in as much
as by the not only
by the at dispatch
produced by these
inventions but by
the advantage of
having the workmen
maintained out of a
fund independent of
the profits, the Claimant
would be the
extent of this quantity
of work have
had the command of
the market — underselling
all Masters employing
men on ordinary terms.
Identifier: | JB/122/342/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1-3, 1-4, 4, 6-8 |
|||
122 |
Panopticon |
||
342 |
Bentham versus Ld Castlereagh of the Treasury Compensation Claim |
||
002 |
Propositions to be proved / Witnesses expected |
||
Rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
2 |
||
"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.
|
|||
JOHN DICKINSON & Co 1809 |
|||
A. Levy |
|||
1809 |
|||
002 |
|||