JB/124/017/001

Click Here To Edit

+ 19
2 Leading Points
Note B.

The grounds of that disapprobation are stated upon
the fac

— One is Two objections are there made — 1. that such burning been though being intended
as a punishment is in the character of a punishment
that point of view "often disregarded and ineffectual."
The proposed identification-mark neither
is a punishment nor is intended as a punishment, so to be.
does not fall within the censure

— 2. The other objective is that it (burning in the hand) there the marking "may sometimes sometimes may
"fix a lasting mark of disgrace and infamy on
"offenders, who might otherwise become good subjects
"and profitable members of society" [+] [+] Here the cause of
infamy efficient causes
of the infamy produced
by that mode of marking
have no existence
and as to the becoming
profitable members of
society, instead of
being, as in that case
it is obstructed, it
is secured
pain I mean and
exposure — (pain too
great not to be evidently
meant for punishment —
exposure
perpetual and unavoidable)
have no
existence. And as
to the becoming profitable
members of society, instead of
being as in that case
obstructed, it is secured. The point mischief
arrived at by this objective here is not I suppose the effect it has
upon the point feelings of the ind delinquents in
question, but in bad effects which may be apprehended
from it with regard in relation to their future good
behaviour. Against From this objective the proposed identification
mark is guarded stands clear in every point of view
The circumstances Of the two circumstances, (pain and constant exposure) that render contribute to the infamy an inevitable
consequence of that effective mode of marking
there is not one that neither has any place in the
instance of this mild and innocent one.

What constitutes the infamy

The mode of producing the mark there meant
to be produced is not only a painful one, but perhaps
the most painful of any that could be devised: and
this one mode besides the corporal suffering which it punishment it contains
neither in itself involves adds to the infamy by the certainty proof
it

Identifier: | JB/124/017/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	124	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	017	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d19 / d20
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	41706
Box Contents