JB/124/030/001

Click Here To Edit

1
Panopticon Bill Reasons

II. Objections to a valuation new in toto, in
contradistinction to the assessment of a supplemental
price. — or

II. Reasons for proposing the assessment of a
supplemental price, in preference to a valuation
new in toto.

What every body knows is that for the purpose
of the formerly included Penitentiary Establishment
the value of the land has been already That ver found. The
verdict by which it was found must, till some objection be made to it be
taken for a true one. I mean, always a true one a
for the time. at which it was given.

Taking that verdict then for a true one at the
time, if If then on the part of the Proprietors a fresh verdict be demanded, it can
only be on one or other of two grounds the ground
of one or other of two allegations suppositions

1. That though a true verdict for that time, it
would not be a true verdict for this: for that the
£6600, if p la paid and laid out now, would
not go so far as it would have done had it
been paid and laid out then. This I admitt:
and

Identifier: | JB/124/030/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	1-5
Box	124	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	030	Info in main headings field	panopticon bill valuation
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d1 / d2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	41719
Box Contents