JB/124/034/004

Click Here To Edit

8
Reasons Panopticon Bill Choice

Upon what plan too could a new choice be
instituted? To whom committ the initiative? To
the Proposer ? alone? — that would lies open to
the objections already stated. To the Supervisors
appointed under the original plan? That would
be still recurring to the old farce of actum agere. Is it for them
to be called upon to condemn their former choice
and make a new one? to condemn too the 12 Judges
and their high Colleagues who confirmed it?
Once again to what purpose and on what grounds?

Other Trustees then must be looked out would be to be sought after for
the purpose. Wh But who then shall they be? In the
first place, by whom named? By Administration? —
be it so. But at whose suggestion? At
the Proposers? — This again would be another
farce. Without his privity then or approbation —
Observe the consequence. What shall be the
force and measure of their influence? Decision,
absolutely binding upon him, it can not never be. It
is out of his pocket that they money is to come
for the purchase of the land: it is out of his
pocket that the money is to come that is to be laid
out upon it. From Administration advances and assistance
are to come it is true; but this does not vary the
argument

Identifier: | JB/124/034/004 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 124.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	124	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	034	Info in main headings field	panopticon bill choice
Image	004	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d5 / d6 / d7 / d8
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	41723
Box Contents