JB/135/036/003

Click Here To Edit

PREFATORIA 3)

which this science has over the others, as examples
of accurate reasoning. The Ideas to be
compared are few. This science considers
objects in one or at most in two points
of view only, their figure & their Quantity.
The terms used are ne are not expressive of Ideas [approach nears
so complex as those to simple Ideas than those] of other sciences,

Take an example

To prove the advantage of this science
in exemplifying the method of correct
reasoning. Let such reasoning be
exemplified by some proposition in
Morality & Chemistry, and see the
difficulty you will be at in finding
Postulates which shall be generally received
as such, and see of what complex
Ideas the terms used will be expressive
of. In prop:s of morality in particular.

announce here some moral proposition explaining
some mode of conduct which men would be happier [it would be better]
if they observed. Shew how impracticable it would
be to find postulates which interest
permit to be generally received.

Shew how far the Ideas are removed from
simple ones, concluding with nothing it

Identifier: | JB/135/036/003 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	135	Main Headings
Folio number	036	Info in main headings field	prefatoria
Image	003	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f1 / f2 / f3 / f4
Penner	sir samuel bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]]
Marginals	sir samuel bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	46154
Box Contents