JB/135/049/003

Click Here To Edit

Conduct

and what if so what manner they had for not
making use of it it was a touch.
I found my method was no new
discovery De Charles Jacquet and as well as several
modern Geometers had had recourse to
the same Criterion. But and I also found
that instead of having him thought to
have him the impressions of the , they
had him against by those who
were held in highest repute nay
even . they had says Simpson
adapted the Vulgar Ideas, this writing
were called mutilated Editions &c.
all the objections to
in two. First that Euclid had nowhere
shew how to divide a quantity into any
number of parts, by that
Quantities to which a common measure
could not be found [which could not
possibly be divided into aliquots] equal parts
These objections I had not find that
any one had answered in a satisfactory
manner others had pursued the same
plane without defending it. &
Simpson have done must towards

Identifier: | JB/135/049/003 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	135	Main Headings
Folio number	049	Info in main headings field	conduct
Image	003	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f13 / f14 / f15 / f16
Penner	sir samuel bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	46167
Box Contents