xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/141/057/002

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

2
Inconveniences.

has only a chance more or less remote of producing
the same effect: others which though there be no
absolute certainty in the case, one of those punishments
has a greater chance of producing
than another has.

On the score of frugality, deforming punishments
are not liable to any objection. Disablement
& mutilation are. If the effect of
either is to deprive a man of the means of
gaining his livelihood by his own labour, & he
he has no sufficient income of his own, he must
either be left to perish or be supported by the
labour of others. If he even left to perish it would
it would not be mere disablement or mutilation
but capital punishment. If he be supported by
the labour of others, that labour must either be
bestowed gratis as would be the case if he were
supported on the charity of relations & friends or
paid for at the public cost; in either case it is
a charge upon the public. This consideration
might of itself, be inefficient to stipulate the serve as a conclusive objection to
application of the modes of punishment in question
to
in the instance of offences that are apt frequently to be committed
such as theft & smuggling, more be considered as a+ + conclusive objection to the application of this mode of punishment: the objection however applies/add> But this applies
only
in of its full force <add>only
to such species only of
those modes as would have the effect of depriving
the particular individual in question of the means of gaining his
livelihood.

In respect of the property of In respect of remissibility
they are altogether eminently defective: which this
furnishes
a consideration that affords an additional reason for making
a very sparing use of them.

In respect also of cost a variability they
are scarcely in a less degree defective. The loss
of the eyes or of the hand would is not to a man
who neither knows can neither read or write the same degree of punishment
as it would be to a Painter or an Author. Yet


Identifier: | JB/141/057/002
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

057

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f2 / f2

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48274

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk