JB/141/106/001

Click Here To Edit

C
Forfeiture of Reputation.
9

must necessarily be limited. To warrant the inference some appearance
of connection, however superficial, there must be between
the two offences. But any little connection however
slight is ordinarily sufficient. In such a case men in general
are not apt to be very difficult with regard to the
evidence.
The vanity of being
thought sagacious, the
pride of sitting in judgment
and condemning,
the hope of earning
a certain measure of reputation
on the score of virtue
at an easy rate
The love of novelty and paradox
and the propensity to exaggeration te especially on the unfavourable
side, second the aim of the Legislator.

So much for the ways in which the political magistrate
may exert an influence over the moral sanction
by the bare exercise of his legislative powers: we now come
to the instances in which he requires the aſsistance of the
executive.

Of all the modes of proceeding measures expedients that may be classed under
this head the least severe is that of publication, the making
public the fact of the offence accompanied with a designation
of the offender. [It isThe effect of such an expedient is principally
to add in point of intensity.] It is principally in point
of extent that a measure of this sort tends to add to the
natural

1. Publication
of the offence together
with the
which the offender
had in it

Identifier: | JB/141/106/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	10-13
Box	141	Main Headings	rationale of punishment
Folio number	106	Info in main headings field	forfeiture of reputation
Image	001	Titles	note
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f9 / f10 / f11 / f12
Penner		Watermarks	[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	caroline fox
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	folio now in 2 pieces	ID Number	48323
Box Contents