JB/141/107/004

Click Here To Edit

12.

C
Forfeiture of Reputation.

leads us to enquire into the different measures of infamy
that stand naturally annext to the several modes of punishment;
and in the course of this enquiry we shall
find reason to distinguish certain punishments from the
rest by the special epithet of infamous, ignominious infamous.

A certain degree of infamy or disrepute we have
already remarked is what necessarily attends on every
kind of political punishment. But there are some that
reflect a much larger portion of infamy than others.(a) These
therefore it is plain are the only ones which can be stated
properly by that name.
Upon

Note.

(a) Aware of this circumstance, the Roman Lawyers have
taken a distinction between the infamia facti and the infamia
juris: the natural Infamy resulting from the offence,
and the artificial infamy produced through the means of
the punishment by the Law. See Heinecc: Elementa Jur. Civil:
Pand. L.3. Tit.2. §.399 whose explanation however is not
very precise.

Identifier: | JB/141/107/004 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	14
Box	141	Main Headings	rationale of punishment
Folio number	107	Info in main headings field	forfeiture of reputation
Image	004	Titles	note
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f13 / f14
Penner		Watermarks	myears
Marginals		Paper Producer	caroline fox
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	48324
Box Contents