★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
But if this be statement correct (and it will not be easy
to conceive say why a reason why it should be otherwise) it is seems
impossible that the statement given in relation to the
same subject by the Finance Committee of 1807-8
32 Report Appendix p.288 should be so too
39977. In under the head of List of Reversions
and of Offices held for Joint Lives in England and Plantations.
No of Paper 345 (a) as find in entry in
these words and figures No of Paper 345. Registrar of the High
Court of Admiralty subject to the deductions entered before
[viz.p.281] £33,478. By There comes thein observation
in these words and figures, viz. By Grant Patent this
office will devolve upon in the Right Honourable Spencer
Percival M.P. brother of Lord Arden upon the decease
of the said Lord Arden. 23d June 1764.
To this date it is left to the House is left to find assign an part:
and the task
is not an easy one. According
to Lord Ardens the passage in Return as copied above the date of his
Lordships patent was the 30th of that same month
and year . At On this day did their already exist
a prior grant made no more than 7 years before in
favour of his younger brother? If so, then it
could not be in the death of Mr Farrant that he
would have to succeed to the office he would after
that death have to wait for that of his said Brother.
But the fact is that to in the death of Mr Farrar
Lord Arden did come into possession of the office: and
not his brother Mr Percival never has been in possession
of the Office.
Identifier: | JB/147/070/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 147.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1810-04-01 |
|||
147 |
Sinecures |
||
070 |
Sinecures |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
C2 / E2 |
||
49295 |
|||