JB/159/004/001

Click Here To Edit

9 March 1811 Punishment. Ch. 1. Definitions and Distinctions

57 or 1
Relation between restraint
& punishment.
Of every prohibitive law
restraint is directly
intentional object, whatsoever
evil is inseparably
attached to it
the collaterally intentional. p.27.

56 or 2
This evil may be in
any proportion less or
greater than the good
if any aimed at. p.27

59 or 3.
Restraint may also
be a mediately intentional
object: viz where
the evil of it I employed
as an eventual punishment,
to secure
submission to constraint
or to restraint in some
other shape. p.27.

60 or 4
The same restraint can
not operate in both characters. p.27.

---page break---

61 or 1.
7 or 1. Relation between
compulsion and punishment.
In compulsion as in
restraint, result aimed
at by the legislator is
the reverse of that of the
offensive acts done by
a delinquent. p.28
Offence positive, result
aimed at negative: viz
restraint
Offence negative result
aimed at positive: viz
compulsion. p 28.

62
Act positive commanded
and meant to be completed,
offence negative.
To & for this offence suppose
punishment applied
if to avoid similar punishment
in future
the offender performs
toties quoties the like
acts in future compulsion
is by this punishment
produced in his instance.
So in the instance of
others if compelled to
obedience, deterred from
disobedience, the do
likewise. p 28.

Identifier: | JB/159/004/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.
Date_1	1811-03-09	Marginal Summary Numbering	57 or 1 - 60 or 4, 61 or 1, 62
Box	159	Main Headings	punishment
Folio number	004	Info in main headings field	punishment ch. 1 definitions and distinctions
Image	001	Titles	restraint / constraint
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d4
Penner		Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals		Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	53827
Box Contents