JB/159/134/003

Click Here To Edit

15

Of the Lex Talionis

do to do hurt to an individual, therefore so would it
for the Legislator Law. He seems not to have considered
[at that moment] that the Law can to punish
in any way is to do hurt. The other instances he gives are
those of Theft, Defamation, Forgery and Adultery.
He says that Theft cannot be punished with by Theft
Defamation by Defamation and so on. His reason
His notion is then that Theft for instance to be punished by according to the
rule of retaliation must be punished by Theft. But
that it should be is not necessary according to that
rule stated as he himself has states it in the next sentence:⊞ ⊞ For the criminal in that case to suffer the same "hurt" he has done to the party

Identifier: | JB/159/134/003 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	159	Main Headings	punishment
Folio number	134	Info in main headings field	of the lex talionis
Image	003	Titles	note
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f13 / f14 / f15 / f16
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	caroline vernon
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	53957
Box Contents