★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
19
Quasi-Imprisonment &c.
Viewing it in either of the three lights above
mentioned, there seems but little room ground for either the subsidiary
punishment to take hold (on the delinquent).
In the case in question it could scarcely answer the
purpose to make the duration of the banishment
with respect to Great Britain and Ireland (only temporary) less than perpetual. This then would
effectually place the person of the delinquent out
of the reach of (punishment) being any more punished in Great
Britain or Ireland (being these being the pervaders of the
British Empire from out of which the delinquents were
expelled and from which they stood excluded it was mean to exclude them) than
if they had not transgressed the prohibition of to
of going to any part of the French or Spanish Empire. If taken
in America indeed in British America, or any other part of the British Empire, after having been in France in Spain
they would indeed be liable to suffer undergo (the punishment subsidiary punishment denounced against). But the effect of this is
only to exclude them from (British America &) those
other parts of the Empire to which there is no
reason for supposing them any ways induced to go.
2. As to The subsidiary therefore It seems therefore to be nugatory or very
nearly so with respect to any effect it could have
upon the person of the delinquent.
As to the property, that while it remained in
Great Britain or Ireland would operate upon him,
pro tanto while it continued there within the Jurisdiction
of those countries: but as there is no chance
to
Identifier: | JB/159/215/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
159 |
punishment |
||
215 |
quasi-imprisonment &c |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
2 |
||
recto |
f19 / f20 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
54038 |
|||