JB/541/471/001

Click Here To Edit

1793-9-23

of comparatively no account, as is most likely, and
the commons objections are repelled which after
the Peers have prevailed, will not this be an
invidious circumstance to say no more? Will it
be becoming decent(to say nothing of justice) to have
one measure for the high and another for the low?

Then if there is to be compulsion who is it to be
trusted to administer it — An A single individual like myself? — This
would hardly be endured — Who else in short, but
the same sort of tribunal who that has already
been chosen for the purpose? But this very tribunal
has already pronounced: it has pronounced
in after confirmation of the present
spot: shall it be called upon to pronounce reverse
its judgment, and pronounce a new
one? And why? upon what ground? — Because
the present proprietor is a man of high rank
and influence ? What if the next choice fell
upon ground that happens to be the property
of a rich Peer is it are the Judges to be called
upon for a new judgment, and so toties quoties
untill the lot fall upon some obscure individual
who is less able than any of them to
bear it, and who can not get any body to bear him command an audience
when

Identifier: | JB/541/471/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.
Date_1	1793-09-23	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	541	Main Headings
Folio number	471	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	Correspondence	Number of Pages
Recto/Verso		Page Numbering
Penner	Jeremy Bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number
Box Contents