JB/004/078/001

Click Here To Edit 1830 April. 14
Review 1 1.
Nomography new branch
apart vscience taken up
by JB.
2.
Object showing how to
give to legislative style
the desirable properties
3
These observations not pu-
blished but in Const.Code
an exemplification of the
style.
4
JB's stile a model Broug-
ham's in this Bill a
beacon.
5.
Of acts of Brougham's Par
liant. the stile as fit as pos-
sible for the purposes for
which they are intended
the promoting the intents of
Judge.
6.
In Brougham's bill instance
of obscurity in §13
7.
By this Section it would
appear that the two
Judges are to sit in con-
pinetion.
8.
This construction confirmes
line 21
9
So again lines 25,26,+27.
10
so again line 30. 11
By this § settle that
the two Judges are to
sit together 12
In certain eases of ex-
ception one to sit alone
but which one it is not
stater.
13.
Again §15 the two
judges to sit together
like the two Kings of
Brentford.
14.
In §24 the two Judges
again sitting together
& by §42 again se-
parate.
15
In §29 another case
of exception with
confusion as to whether
the Judges are to act
together or separate.
16
In Sect.30 confusion as
to if summons. 18. In no act of Parliament any
such a maps as that ex- hibits in these sections
19.
In all sections from §30
to 109 the last confusion
between Judges Registrar
sheriff and other func-
tionaries
20
Sign of the loggesheads
might be applied to the
author of this bible and
these two children of his
brain.
22.
So as to Registrar Confusion
between simple and plu-
ral numbers.
23.
Mutual relation between
Judge & Registrar some-
what enigmatical.
24.
In some cases Registrar not
so good as in some equal to
in others better than Judges.
25.
In§12 Time when the Judge
is to hear the matter in ques-
tion to be fixed not by the Judge
but by the Registrar.
26.
Amusing and instructive
operation comparing in
this respect J.B's &HB's
draughts. 27.
Comprehensivenefs foresight
and correctnefs exemplified
in J.B's draughts.
28.
Utter in aptitude of HB's
draught
29.
Lenus and propositions
simple and complicated.
30.
Singular and plural
number confusion between
31.
If at the commencement the
two Judges of the same spe-
cies in each Judges hire
had been brought to view
no such confusion would
have had place.
32
Ignorance displayed by
Brougham as to number of
parties to a suit there may
be on each side.
33.
Redundancy and insuffieciency
these two opposite defects
often unites.
34
J.B's work not held out as
a matter of perfection
35
As to matter redundancy
worse than uselefs.
36.
In case of monography
sufficiency redundancy and
deficiency relative only.
37.
illutrated by a egpher
in which words composed of
3, 4, or more letters added to the
one which is to convey the import.

13
4
78
Broughhams

Identifier: | JB/004/078/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.
Date_1	1830-08-14	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-16, 18-37
Box	004	Main Headings	lord brougham displayed
Folio number	078	Info in main headings field	review
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	richard doane	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	1999
Box Contents