JB/004/172/001

Click Here To Edit

1830. July 28
Review

Chicania
2 Smalldebtia

☞ Write on the supposition of its belonging to Legacia.
Might not these be advantageously substitutes to what had been
Now for reinquiries written before with Smalldebtia
under Reinquiry?

1. Reinquiry the first — §.54. Against the defendant
judgment is supposed to have been signed. What
follows? execution? No: but if said Defendant
pleases, a fresh battle carried on — let any man
who thinks it worth his while, on consulting consultation had with his
imagination, say have
some time afterwards (when?) the defendant "appears" (where?)
"at the day mentioned in the summons" (what summons?)
whereupon comes power to the Judge "to diminish the

"sum for which judgment shall have been signed, upon
"hearing the circumstances of the case." What if, indeed
instead of a string of special pleadings the suit had begun
with "hearing the circumstances of the case," in so far
as they were to be heard for the supposed applicant — the
proposed demandant — and supposing the application
complied with continued, by hearing plea from the
proposed defendant, and any such other Evidence holder
as it happened to the individual case to afford?

Identifier: | JB/004/172/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.
Date_1	1830-07-28	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	004	Main Headings	lord brougham displayed
Folio number	172	Info in main headings field	review
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	2093
Box Contents