JB/006/189/001

Click Here To Edit

24 Feby 1813 17
Church

II. Doctrine
Ch. 6. A Direction
§. Engl. & Scottish Practice

1
Think in what state
any science, chemistry
for example would
have been under such
an expedient. p.1

2
Superiority of importance
no reason. Is
Christianity less liable
to errors than
Chemistry? Per Mosheim
the history
of Christianity, a
history of errors. Is
exclusion of enquiry
a better security in
theology than in
Chemistry? If error
be here of more importance,
why take
means to perpetuate
it. If error be of light
importance why take
a method so pernicious
to public morals.
p.1.

3
No Tenet need be
retracted or doubted
of — One error is to
be retracted, and that
a political one, viz
the thinking that
by such a course
truth or sincerity
is served — & this, an
error of your ancestors,
not your own. When
set on foot, it was no
error. At first, it was
necessitated by the
need of clinging together.
The error was
to render it perpetual
& as in 1782 to
confirm it. p.2.

(a)
The confirmations
given under something
of a panic — in 1711 after
the Union when by
the minor nation
much evil was apprehended.
p.3.

The latter confirmation
after Ld G. Gordon's riots.
p.3

Identifier: | JB/006/189/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 6.
Date_1	1813-02-24	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-3, a
Box	006	Main Headings	church of englandism
Folio number	189	Info in main headings field	church
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d17 / e3
Penner	walter coulson	Watermarks	john dickinson & c<…> 1809
Marginals		Paper Producer	a. levy
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1809
Notes public		ID Number	2922
Box Contents