xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/111/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit


1829 March 22
Reformists Petition Reviewed

Supplemental
Postscript

Reformists Classed
Historical anti-reformists

(5)
27 March Quere whether to employ this?

15
As to Method
Courses v Orders here
pursued —
1. The Historical
2. The logical: viz
any other than the Historical

One word as to the method here pursued. Altogether
necessary to the purpose was the historical order here pursued. Subordinate
to it the regard paid to what may be termed the logical. The proportion

For the exposure of the inaptitude of the existing
to be found in the inaptitude of the existing system: nil as this is that
portion not in respect of perks, howsoever numerous and

system two courses presented themselves to choice. Inaptitude
— but of the whole together: and to the application of the indispensable
being a word of relation — supposes the existence
remedy, an adequate conception of the cause of the evil
of standard of comparison, explicit or implied
was is a condition altogether indispensable.Hereafter the all-preceding
The standard of this same being indispensable
and all embracing cause came to exposition in the first place of the principle of the evil
shall it then be laid down in the first place
effects | directly and declaredly, or only implicitly and in the
way of allusion? In Be this question its own answer seems
to be implied conveyed. Upon further reflection however such will
not be found to be the case. On the other hand neither on the part of the What it supports and grounds
itself upon is this that the proposed system has been freedom of deformity here exhibited separately considered, was
a of this deformity in the mind of those in
already the supposed apt system proposed as a succedaneum
application of the remedy depends, a condition less necessary. But
to the averred useful; system has been already completed
to a in assurance of inaptitude, some conception of a standard of apparent
This being supposed done, then as the proposed
aptitude as not also necessary. What then was to be done For
proceeds, in its normal parts the existing system is in the correspondent
any such standard is a state to completeness selling less the one
perk applied to it, and the difference held up to view
all-comprehensive Act in both subjects and that a

But Good. But what this course supposes is that
that which it has duly proposed to be done is done already Considered as in place
has been sufficient. But this if done would be the very thing which then
which has for its object the causing to be done. necessity therefore was this course given up Here then was a decision
to be made. In who ca which may be stated the logical without any particular
being that given up, the one here pursued which was substituted
to it. It This may be stated the historical. For on another
account this order of proceeding seemed indisputable. Without
the th a view taken of the inaptitude a conception formed

As to other parts a particular standard of aptitude of the cause of the disorder required to
be laid down neither the of the excess of it, nor of the absolute Such accordingly is the course which will be seen pursued
demand for the proposed remedy be understood.

Not yet has the logical method been left altogether unemployed.
To a considerable extent the feature of inaptitude
even to such a degree apparent, that when once held up
to view to that character the common sense sufficed
of itself for satisfying any eye that could endure
the sight, that such as the character that rightly belongs to it:
and whosoever to the purpose of being persuaded of the inaptitude in
question, it seemed requisite that a portion of the standard in
question
question should be brought held up
to view, held up to view
it accordingly.



Identifier: | JB/011/111/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-03-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

15

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3808

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk