JB/016/098/001

Click Here To Edit

1827. Septr. 8
Penal Constitutional Code

D 3
Ch. —Remedies to Challenging & duelling
Homicide
(4) (3 § Challengers. Species

1 Ill Will. 2. Angry Self-p reputation preserving Reputation saving Duelling Challenger 3. Love of power — Tyrant Duelling
Duelling Challenger 5. Competition quelling 6 7
Verily reputation protecting Challenger 8. Challenger —

☞ Begin with the most recent
case?

After this speak of
the denial of justice by
expense of it as the
cause that brings these
motives into operation.
Challenging as it puts
both upon an equality
checks appropriate

Evil of 2d order will be
According to motive

According to/Correspondent to the motive by which the Challenge
§ Species of challenger — thus species deduced from the Motives
was produced will be the evil of the fecund order and on
that account will singly or in conjunction with
other accounts will be the demand for punishment for the subsequentally
preventive purpose

2
Mandate to be issued
against challenger —
a aprehension mandate

Forasmuch as, antecedently to the examination
of the supposed Challenger, the motive which gives brook to the
challenge can not in general be ascertained, nor yet can it be ascertained
whether that an accerative warrant mandate would suffice for procuring
his timely appearance a prehensive mandate is the
mandate which should on this occasion should in every instance be

3
1 Angry Duellist motive
Ill will

1. In the breast of The Challenger no matter for the present by which
one of a number of causes has been produced a sentiment of ill-will by towards
the Challenger and of that sentiment the so
great that for the chance of depriving him of life, without the
imputation of serious , he is content and desirous to
put him in an equal hazard. Motive ill will [Species of]
would be Challenger Duellist the Angry Duellist Challenger

4
2. Rancerous duellist
motive. Ill will long
continued

2. If the duration of this sentiment has been
to a certain degree considerable it may be regarded and not without
reason of producing and operating an aggravation of the wrong

[Species of] Duellist Challenger, the Rancerous Duellist Rancerous Challenger

For Reason why it is considered as an aggravation and why
the caller can present a demand for encrease on the quantum
of the remedy, see below

5
3 Vindictive duellist
Motive Revenge for
real or supposed injury

3. The Challenger has received or regards himself in
having received a wrong an injury at the hands of the challengee, and
it is by the hope of producing the pleasure resulting from death or other bodily suffering
on the part of the Challengee that he is content to subject expose himself
to this hazard. the Vindictive Challenger.

Identifier: | JB/016/098/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 16.
Date_1	1827-09-08	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-5
Box	016	Main Headings	penal code
Folio number	098	Info in main headings field	penal code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / d3 / e3
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	brocklesby & morbey 1827
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer	edmund henry barker
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1827
Notes public		ID Number	5905
Box Contents