★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
6
Remedies
Ch. Challenging and
Duelling
(6 §. Punishment and Compensation
Time a quarter of a years'
10
Qy why prehend in
the first instance. Ans.
to secure against
the responsibility of
co-offender
Question Why prehend in the first instance
or circumstance evidence brought to view of the Judge by
accident without any the direct evidence of any person who in the character
of informant will would be responsible for the part in case of what its?
However to secure against hazard the expectant response
likely of the principal and the other Co-offenders as above as well
as the official prevention of the combat.
11
Efficacy of pecuniary
punishment proved
by experience
Of the efficacy of pertinence of the pecuniary punishment in this case,
this In the body of expence afforded by in English
practice. Not infrequent are the instances in which, a
challenge having been received or sent, the parties, being on
from some body of one or both of them, brought by a
prehensive warrant before a Justice of the Peace by his authority
in order to save themselves from combat, and to , extend
into as called a receipt as branding them
each of them cowardly with a an for the keeping
1. words is understood to be excluded at
it entering a
or any other. If of the a threat against
scarcely if ever has man to man been ever known to have
taken place
12
This likely to be still
more efficient under
a code exempt from
sympathetic influence
If in Such being the efficient being the influence of a
pecuniary penalty in the hands of parties agitated by passion
to such a degree as to expose life to so great a hazard
much more may it be expected to be among the
without any self-regarding interest of the self-regard
made in the business — in a word example
other the greater interest of sympathy
Not that by punishment attached to the offence of Co
offender was constantly can be as
with any confidence be expected to be applied. First person
being the — remains on the part of the parties any the distinction and with it the
of arranging and accomplishing the matter of themselves
without the intervention of any assistants
Identifier: | JB/016/109/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 16.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-09-10 |
10-12 |
||
016 |
penal code |
||
109 |
[[info_in_main_headings_field::pe[nal] code]] |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d6 / e6 |
||
jeremy bentham |
brocklesby & morbey 1827 |
||
edmund henry barker |
|||
1827 |
|||
5916 |
|||