JB/016/162/001

Click Here To Edit

1828. Jany. 7
Law Amendment.Propositions
Ch. II Codification
Ch. III Remedies Duelling & Enactments
Species from Motives

1. Passionate and r bloodthirsty Challenging Duellist –
2. Rancorous bloodthirsty Challenging Duellists: these will
Cause of the demand for distinction in the case of these sub-species,
difference in respect of the magnitude of the evil
of the 2d order – including the danger and the alarm, and the nature
and force of the remedies capable of being applied.
In the case of the passionate challenging Duellist in regard to the inchoate offence, that is to say the act of challenging the preventive
remedy is out of the question, there not being the between the design and the execution long interval of time
in which application can be made of it.

Only to the inchoate offence has this distinction any
application: for if notwithstanding the application made
of the suppressive remedy or remedies the design continues,
the species is by this perseverance changed being converted
into the rancorous.

If the rancorous species be taken for the principal object – for the object of
comparis reference and a comparison, the passionate will
constitute with reference to it a circumstance of extenuation
– an extenuative circumstance.

Identifier: | JB/016/162/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 16.
Date_1	1828-01-07	Marginal Summary Numbering	14-16
Box	016	Main Headings	law amendment
Folio number	162	Info in main headings field	law amendment
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d7 / e7
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	5969
Box Contents