xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/034/002

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1823. April 10. Aug.

Constit. & Procedure Code

Ch.9 Jury &c.

§ Spontaneously-serving

24 or 1.

Art.1 Spontaneously
serving committee.

Members.

1. Parties litigant in
other causes waiting
their twin.

2. Non-litigant witnesses
do.

3. Of parties litigant companions,
Assistance private
or professional, connections
by self-regarding
interest or sympathy
on account private or
public.

4. Non-adult attending
spontaneously, or by di-

Failing Quasi Jurors
others drawable by
either party not of the
Committee of Visitors
the other Party negatory
or challenging.

§. Habilement?

§ Fan Jurors.?

-tude, especially probity,
preponderant inconve-


23 or 13.

Failing every Juror,
Judge addresses Advocates
General, as per

§. Art.

3. By Appeal warranty for
saving
of imprudent Appeal without
pro to security §.14.

4. By statistic effect showing progresses
duties of corroboration

5. Server as a Select of
to all who serve. §.34
or English but with less inconvenience
& and more profit


---page break---

III. Rationale

Ch. Quasi-Jury
"Pritem" or Gen.l. Observations
Topics extracted from Co

§.1. Legislature - not to establish
but check arbitrary
power - viz. in Judges 1.

§ 2 Advantages of this mode

1. Application it makes of
the power of the Publ. Opin.
Tribunal to retrain the powers of
the Judge within due limits
4.6.10.11

§.3 Means of check to Publicity.
12.29.30. See 54
55.56.57.58.59.6

§4 Means of check 2. Forcing
reasons and explanations. 13
14.29.30.

§.5 Number of Quasi Jurors 15.16.17.20
22

§ 6 Place whence. 18.19.21

§ 7. Pay. 24.25.26

§.8 Power of Deputation.27.


III. Rationale.

Ch Quasi Jury

Ch. III Examination RetatedQuasi Jury

S. Judication generally

Judge who 9. 37 Enact or

III. Rationale

Art. 9. Appointment
made on requisition
against the above advantage,
stands the
disadvantage from
mutual dissatisfaction:
danger lest by the
token of party's dissatisfaction,
displeasure,
thence adverse partiality,
be produced in
Judge's to obviate such
uneasiness will be among
the objects of his
solicitudes.


band, delay, vexation and expence
or the other.


---page break---

Appeal

§.15 Appeal-warranting
continued

1. Danger if no such power.
be given to Quasi Jury small 41
42.43.44.! 68.69.70.7

(§.16.2 Security, if such power
be given. 45.46.68.69.70.71.
72.73.74.75 78.79.80

(1)

(§17.3. Inconvenience if ap
in all cases power of Appeal
be given to Convicts. 38.
39.40.


Appeal

(§18.4. Effect of Appeal what?
1 Appellate grounds itself in Report
? 2. Does it retry
of course? Does it opt make
its option? between the two
courses? 47

Appeal

§ 19 Appealing warranting
power to Quasi Jury only
not to Visitors. 48


Anglia

§20 English practice-infers
-only if the security afforded
by it against under punishment.
76.71.

Anglia

§21 Advantages of Quasi-
Jury do of English Jury the
standard of comparison
Beneficial effects produced
by it. 49.50.51

§21, As to the whole of that
part of the field of law it
extends to 1. Publicity 54.55.56.57
58.59.60. See above

23.3. Necessitating Obliging the Judge to
justify his conduct by
statements explanation and reasons. 62.
.3

Anglia

24 Cases where its beneficial
effects have been produced by
pdecisive power over the
decision these confined to
perial law: cannot chiefly
in debilitating it: 64.65.66

Anglia

S.25 Anglia necessity for this
arbitrary counter force. 66
67.


---page break---

III Rationale

Ch Quasi Jury


Judge who. 8. 36 or

III. Rationale

Art.8. Appointment
made spontaneously
by Judge, lest the recapitulatory
examination
be by the same: advantage,
recollection of lights
afforded by the original
examination, especially
as to consistency bet<hi rend="underline">n</hi>
same person's testimony
the first and second time
thence to the Judgement
additional clearness,
correctness and compleatness.

Anglici

S.31.6. Locator, dited by
sinister interests of Monarchs

A

S.32.7. Extent of authority jurisdiction
inadequate. 87.88.89.90

Sinister interests it
unchecked. 89.90. on
S delay and


S.33. In thing in
denying to the people and
power one judicator
to a class rendered by the
power of location and disabuse
sup over the
Operative.? 91.92.93.
94.95.


Beneficial effect

S 34 Advantages all
of the Quasi Jury System.

Quasi Jury

2 33 or 2

Art.2. Vexation of Quasi
Jurors such as to magnitude
and extent as to preponderate
over the good
by the superior security
for rectitude of decision
Legislature will determine
in what suits
it shall not be called in


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/034/034/002
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-04-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::24 or 1, 23 or 13, 37 or [sic], 36 or [sic], 33 or 2]]

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

034

Info in main headings field

constitut. & procedure code

Image

002

Titles

ch. 9 jury &c

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10308

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk