xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/141/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1828 Septr. 4

Constitutional Code.

III. Rationale
Ch Quasi-Jury
Explany Observat.
§ 1. Additional features
Tru Sheet
1
3. Th service to ends
of justice, securing to evidence
the most apt shape where
obtainable: viz when
without any valuation dence
it passes, in
presence of the auditory
form the lips of thea relating
witness to the care
of the judge by whose
decision is grounded on it
is pronounced: subject
to be made correct
and compleat by interrogation: and not strain through the similar purparty vitiating medium of pain [+]

3. Third distinguishable mode in which the ends of Jury system
as established in the service in which it is in use has been conducive to the ends of justice, causing securing
the exhalation evidence to continue to be received in the least
decapt shape that to say the oral shape the most best shape.
namely that in which it passes immediately from the lips
of the relating witness to the ear of the Judge and the
surrounding auditory, without being strained through the
bes of of professional or official instruments or both, paid
all of them at the rate of so much a word for initiating it.

51

No less capable of being
given to evidence in this
most apt shape in Judicatories
without Jury
than in Judicatories with
Jury: nor on onethe occasions
where the Jury is not,
than on do where it is
called in

Neither is this feature inseparable in its nature
from Jury procedure Neither in this instance is there
any thing in the nature of evidence on the one hand or
of Jury procedure on the other that render that forbids
the reception of renders it more & prevents difficulty to receive evidence in this excludes evidence for being res in the
form shape in any other sort of Judicatory there in that
of which a Jury forms a part. In relation to a fact open
to dispute, no Judge nor other ruling functionary that really wished to come at the truth
ever thought of having -receiving evidence in any other
shape wh without having received in this, when in this
shape it was within reach. [+] But, except in in so far as truth the truth [+] Witness all Parliamentary
enquiries.
Witness every father of
a family in his dealings
with his children or his
servants.
Witness the enquiries
carried in or the occasion
of these enemies from by which
the minds of individuals are rather
governor as, well as governed
app of injury
done to person of property.

was regarded as conducive to the giving effect to his power is that of
on whom whose power has he was dependent, nor person functionary concerned in the
framing of the rules of procedure did ever did wish to at
the truth harbours any such wish as that of seeing the truth over a light causing at or enabling
his colleagues associates and successive to come at the truth. TheirThe
aim has uniformly been, as it could not but be, by means of to extract
and or with the help of such instruments as could be consented
out of the products of suitors a money in the greatest quantity
in which it could be so extracted. On the contrary the object of
it was that in testimonial statements the quantity of falshood
should be maximized that further proceedings and further writing for the exposure of it
might be necessitated

52
Where the faculty of
giving this shape to it is
within reach by no
Judge who wishes to
at the truth is it ever received
in any other. Witness
1. Parliamentary inquiries
for legislative purposes
2. Investigational inquiries
as to ing deemed impartial
enough.
3. Domestic procedure, as to children
or servants offences

53
But of none ofthose by whom the course of procedure
has any where been established, has
it been the wish that the truth be come at.
To maximize professional and [+]
[+] official profit has been their wish: thence to maximize falsehood that further proceedings might be necessitated. ]



Identifier: | JB/034/141/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

50-53

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

141

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c4 / c1 / d15 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10415

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk