xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/145/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1823. Sept.r 4

Constitutional Code.

III Rationale
Ch. Quasi Jury
S 1 Explanations Observations
§.2. Discourse features

66
As in a Monarchy it
could serve fact to be
by a Centre of the Monarchy
immediately or
unimmediately, are
these supposed bridlers
of the Judge almost every
where located.

Accordingly, it being by a single functionary that, in every case
the selection of the assessors to the Judge is made that functions
in no almost every instance an individual treated by
immediately or unimmediately by the Monarch

By way of

Against partiality in the

67
Note the inconsistency
of the arrangement with
the principle applied
in the case of challenging
In a suit between individual
and individual
the whole body may be set
aside by the presumption
of partiality in the Locator
as inferred from
some relation of self-regarding
or sympathetic
interest
Seldom can the operation
of every such cause
of partiality be so
sure by produced by
any such private relationship
as have by the public relationship

In the a case between individual and individual the law
made by other dependent instance of the same all ruling functionary
given in a certain case to the individual on each side of the cause the faculty of
putting an exclusion upon the whole body of those selected. This
case is that of supposed connection in the way of self-regarding interest or
sympathy with an individual in this - that side of the suit:
a connection granted in circumstantial evidence in a certain
shape. The operation by which the faculty thus allowed or brought
into exercise is called challenging: and in this instance challenging
array: is as applying the objection objecting to the whole body, by reason of the
situation of him by whom the members of it were treated

But in scarcely in any no one case between individual and individual
from the relation between the and a party to the suit on
either side could be furnishes such any such demand for such superior
or equal in cogency for to that by which the late exclusion is
called for in every case in which on one side the an individual
and in the other a Monarch or some instrument of which
is to be found.



Identifier: | JB/034/145/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

66-67

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / d19 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10419

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk